About memartone

Maryann Martone was previously Director of Biosciences and Scholarly Communications at Hypothesis and before that, was at UCSD, where she led the Neuroscience Information Framework (NIF), a national project to establish a uniform resource description framework for neuroscience, and the NIDDK Information Network (dknet), a portal for connecting researchers in digestive, kidney and metabolic disease to data, tools, and materials. She served as a Co-Investigator on the Monarch Initiative, a knowledge base for linking model systems to human disease. She is Editor-in-Chief of Brain and Behavior, and a Senior Editor at two new journals, Collabra and Nature Scientific Data. Dr. Martone is President of FORCE11, an organization dedicated to advancing scholarly communication and e-scholarship. Maryann Martone received her BA from Wellesley College in Biological Psychology and Ancient Greek and her Ph. D. in Neuroscience from the University of California, San Diego. She spent over 30 years at UCSD and is currently on leave from her position as Professor of Neuroscience. She started her career as a neuroanatomist, specializing in light and electron microscopy, but her main research for the past 15 years focused on informatics for neuroscience, i.e., neuroinformatics.

Annotating All Knowledge, FAIRly

Join the conversation connecting FAIR data to digital annotation at the second annual Annotating All Knowledge Coalition face-to-face meeting, co-located in Berlin with FORCE2017.

By |2020-12-04T10:44:24-08:00September 11th, 2017|

The GO FAIR Initiative

Originally posted at Pundit by Francesca Di Donato The diffusion and the public endorsement of data FAIRness has been rapid. The FAIR Data Principles were were published in late 2014 and early 2015. In 2015 at their summit in Japan, the European Council and the G7 adopted Open Science and the reusability of research data as a priority, [...]

By |2017-05-30T10:31:31-07:00May 4th, 2017|

Hypothesis for Scientific Research

Hypothesis is enjoying robust use in the sciences: in STEM education (e.g., Science in the Classroom), as a tool for scientists to critique reporting of science in the popular press (e.g., Climate Feedback), for journal clubs and by individual researchers engaging in public or private group discussions on scientific papers. Some of these uses are conversational, as Hypothesis originally envisioned: people ask questions, get answers, make comments. Other annotations are more formal and authoritative; experts extract structured knowledge from the literature, annotate gene sequences with biological information or supply clarifying information to published works.

By |2017-05-30T10:39:27-07:00March 27th, 2017|

Annotating all Knowledge: Adventures in Interoperability

The Annotating All Knowledge Coalition was founded as a forum for accelerating the development of a pervasive interoperable annotation layer across all scholarly works. Figuring out what, exactly, an interoperable annotation layer means was one of the first goals of the coalition. We took the first steps towards defining what an interoperable layer looks like and how it should operate at our Face to Face meetings at FORCE2016 and I Annotate. So what are the next steps? Participants in both events felt strongly that the best way to move forward was to “Just do it”, that is, identify a use case where you have a need to share annotations across: tools, content, platforms, workflows.

By |2017-05-11T22:33:07-07:00February 9th, 2017|

Who says neuroscientists don’t need more brains? Annotation with SciBot

You might think that neuroscientists already have enough brains, but apparently not. Over 100 neuroscientists attending the recent annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience (SFN), took part in an annotation challenge: modifying scientific papers to add simple references that automatically generate and attach Hypothesis annotations, filled with key related information. To sweeten the pot, our friends at Gigascience gave researchers who annotated their own papers their very own brain hats. But handing out brains is not just a conference gimmick. Thanks to our colleagues at the Neuroscience Information Framework (NIF), Hypothesis was once again featured at SFN, the largest gathering of neuroscientists in the world, attended by well over 30,000 people in San Diego Nov 12-16, 2016. The annotation challenge at SFN was a demonstration of a much larger collaboration with NIF: to increase rigor and reproducibility in neuroscience by using the NIF’s new SciBot service to annotate publications automatically with links to related materials and tools that researchers use in scientific studies.

By |2017-11-14T18:04:56-08:00January 31st, 2017|

Why does bioscience need open annotation?

I joined Hypothesis because I believe that an open annotation layer can serve as a dynamic, unifying technology for addressing some of structural weaknesses in our current biomedical platforms.

By |2020-09-21T18:18:52-07:00January 21st, 2016|

Hypothesis at Society for Neuroscience

At long last, I’m able to sit down and summarize my thoughts and experiences on Hypothesis at the Society for Neuroscience meeting in Chicago, Oct 17-21st. First of all, a hearty, gigantic thank you to my colleagues at the Neuroscience Information Framework, a Hypothesis partner, for featuring Hypothesis at the NIF booth and for helping [...]

By |2015-12-11T14:07:29-08:00November 19th, 2015|

Working with Wikipedia articles

Hypothesis is exploring the use of on-line annotation to provide review and enhancement of Wikipedia articles. The Neuroscience Wiki Project encourages the neuroscience community to improve the accuracy and robustness of neuroscience articles by directly editing Wikipedia.  While that approach is still best, many researchers may not have time or be unsure of proper protocols [...]

By |2015-12-16T20:58:26-08:00September 29th, 2015|

Introducing web-based annotation to neuroscience

For as long as we have produced scholarly works, we have annotated them.  From scribbles in the margin, to underlines and highlights, to learned commentary providing additional information, academics routinely add knowledge to scholarly output.  But scholarly works are no longer in scrolls or even on paper, they are on web pages.  So shouldn’t our [...]

By |2015-12-16T20:58:52-08:00September 29th, 2015|