Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

 

Revolutionize Scholarly Reading with Hypothesis + JSTOR

 

Scholarly reading is a cornerstone of education, but challenges like daunting texts, low engagement, and high dropout rates persist. The integration of Hypothesis + JSTOR addresses these issues, transforming how students interact with scholarly texts and each other. Participants in both services can already experience the power of social annotation through our seamless integration.

Benefits of Hypothesis + JSTOR

 

  • Complete Reading Assignments: Make scholarly texts more engaging and digestible, motivating students to start and complete their readings.
  • Scaffold Reading for Better Understanding: Break down complex ideas with social annotation, guiding students through difficult texts for improved comprehension.
  • Enhance Reading Strategies: Develop essential metacognitive strategies for academic reading, fostering self-awareness and reflective learning.
  • Promote Critical Thinking and Writing: Encourage critical engagement, helping students formulate and express their arguments, enhancing critical thinking and writing skills.
  • Foster Peer Learning and Collaboration: Create a vibrant, collaborative online learning community, enabling students to learn from and with their peers.

To learn how to enhance your students’ learning experience with Hypothesis on JSTOR, complete the form below.


Discover the Difference

Case Studies:

 

R1 Institution School of Pharmacy

After implementing Hypothesis over their scholarly reading, this institution noticed improvements in student comprehension, engagement with texts, increased class discussion, and increased PITS survey results. 

University of California – Santa Cruz 

Explore our case study with the University of California – Santa Cruz to see the positive impact Hypothesis had on student engagement and academic performance when used with JSTOR content.

 

Watch our instructional video for a quick overview of how Hypothesis integrates with JSTOR, making scholarly reading more interactive and accessible for students.

 

Join the Movement

Embrace the future of scholarly reading. Participants in both services can already experience the power of social annotation through our seamless integration. To learn how to enhance your students’ learning experience with Hypothesis on JSTOR, complete the form below.